Wii U owners are lucky to have been spared the release of Aliens: Colonial Marines, a disaster of a release that is only overshadowed by how incompetently EA handled the SimCity release for PC. The saga of how Gearbox passed off work on Colonial Marines to another studio in order to work on Borderlands 2 has been well documented. One gamer believes he was severely misled with the advertising versus the final product he received. A lawsuit has been filed by lawfirm Edelson LLC on behalf of their client Damion Perrine, who is seeking damages for fans who bought the title after watching demos of the vertical slice shown at PAX East and E3. The claim states: “Each of the ‘actual gameplay’ demonstrations purported to show consumers exactly what they would be buying: a cutting edge video game with very specific features and qualities. Unfortunately for their fans, Defendants never told anyone — consumers, industry critics, reviewers, or reporters — that their ‘actual gameplay’ demonstration advertising campaign bore little resemblance to the retail product that would eventually be sold to a large community of unwitting purchasers.” This isn’t the first time Sega has been taken to task for false advertising, as it had to publish a disclaimer in the UK trailer after a complaint was filed to the Advertising Standards Agency. Both Gearbox and Sega remain silent on the matter, but Gearbox CEO Randy Pitchford’s own tweets have been cited as evidence against him, so we’ll see just how long that silence remains. Should this lawsuit award damages, it will set a new precedent for how video game demos can be advertised. What do you think of the lawsuit? Is it warranted? Let us know in the comments below. [via Polygon] local_offer aliens colonial marines Gearbox Software lawsuit Nintendo SEGA wii u stars Further Reading Nintendo shares up 20% since Switch launch What's your dumbest death in Breath of the Wild? Mario Kart 8 Switch vs Wii U comparison Miyamoto shot down this stamina regen idea for BoTW Nintendo Network maintenance this week Nintendo releases Zelda: Breath of the Wild a Frank He’s completely justified. Though I should place blame mostly on the developer; I feel we need to hold both publishers and developers accountable. Gearbox should’ve made more effort to make the game more next gen. it feels like a Xobx/PS2 era game. Hopefully other developers will take this lesson and make more quality product that justifies $50-60 price tag Potemkin Should have waited for a review before buying. Adrian Haha, if everybody did that, then nobody would ever buy any games. Ever. Unless you trust “professional” reviews. Potemkin Well, I do and I do buy games. I’m pretty sure there are other people around that do the same. Adrian I mean literally if everybody did that. For example, if everybody at a party refused to have any cake until somebody else took the first piece, the cake will never be eaten. Because that first piece would never be taken. My point is that somebody has to be first, so even if your mentality of “wait till others test it for me” works for you, it doesn’t (and can’t) work for everybody. Potemkin Might be the case. Then again I never buy a game nor a gaming console on release date. AZHood What’s surprisingly about this is how long it took for this lawsuit to happen. ALinkToTheButterballs They also Advertised it was coming to the Wii U… So that is also false advertisement… NOT A GAME I WAS EVEN LOOKING FORWARD TO! LMAO! Retro Cool I feel I could kind of due the same for Rayman Legends from being exclusively for the Wii and pumping us with dates and then just totally back out.. LOL jay sony should be sued for all their false advertising. They’ve been showing fake demos before every console launch since the ps1. Adrian Any consumer who feels they were “tricked” into buying a product because of misleading or untrue advertising has the right to sue. Unfortunately, you usually can only sue for damages, so I don’t know if he can get more than $60 out of it. Unless he is filing a class action lawsuit to share with the rest of the gamers who purchased the game. I’m no legal expert though, I’m sure there are other options. Johny haha wow 😀 audi lover Sue hahah what a dick glad I live in uk where only complete twats sue people, most decent people just get on with there life, cant stand the claims culture Adrian I’m glad you think it’s ideal for a business to be able to screw over, con, or trick a consumer into buying their product using false promises, manipulative wording, or other types of false advertising. I’m glad you think it’s ideal that a victim of such a thing should not be allowed to legally take action and receive compensation for damages. I’m glad you amuse yourself by judging others and other cultures. It’s such a glad day :). Justin Gray The guy who bought the game was a moron and deserved to lose the $60. He went and bought a game that was getting 4 out of 10 reviews from generous reviewers. mikoenig He’s not suing because the game was bad, he’s suing because they falsely represented the game. sdmac200600 Didn’t this news come out like a month or two ago? I’m not the only one right?